PDA

View Full Version : Cam comparison between Nokia, Photograper and CameraFX



Sackgesicht
06-03-2003, 02:30 PM
Hi,

I made test photos yet with all three cameras by the actuall software versions each.

The weather was not nice, not rain, not sun and very big clouds. Means: A grey day.

But all shoots are made at the time time and at the same place = same conditions for all Cam softwares. Oh, phone was 7650 and the settings was always to the best.

At the left corner you see the names: NO = Nokia build in cam, PH= Photographer, FX= Camera FX.

Lets take a look:

First pic from a Church (http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/Church1.jpg)

2nd pic shows a zoom shot (not Nokia Cam) (http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/Zoom.jpg)

Greetz
Sackgesicht

[7]
25-03-2003, 07:48 AM
nice man. The pic in CameraFX is definetly the worse. the huish purple lines in the sky are horibble. The battle between Photographer and the Nokia built-in cams are closer. The tower in the Nokia cam is slightly curved, giving it that "cam lens" look. Same with CameraFX. In photographer the tower to the right is noticable straighter. The quality of the pictures in my eyes are pretty mmuch the same between the nokia cam and photographer: however the picture in the nokia cam looks slightly sharper (you can notice it more if you look at the black parked car on the left corner or the pics.

PritpalSpall
25-03-2003, 11:40 AM
Ive been trying to do a little test like this for ages, took loads of pictures, never uploaded them to a computer to compare......... but this has explained all my anwsers.

Thanks Sackgesicht :cool:

Sackgesicht
25-03-2003, 12:12 PM
... you welcome.

Here are pics again:

http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/Garage.jpg

Greetz
Sackgesicht

[7]
26-03-2003, 10:34 PM
...the pics of the garage are pretty interesting.

the resolution is a bit closer (I guess CamFX lucked out in this pic cause theres no sky :eek: ) on all the pics. However, the Nokia Cam and CameraFX's ability to warp the picture into a circular "camera-lens" look comes out clearer in these comparisons. You can CLEARLY see that the photographer picture is straighter than camerafx and nokia's cam. If you look at the outline of the black pavement in contrast to the garage door, you can see that CameraFX and Nokias cams pics are curved.

round 3 hopefully with some random people? :P

BlueMaskeR
27-03-2003, 10:21 AM
but in 3650


Nokia's built in Camera is Much much better that PH or FX

dj^^
28-03-2003, 12:41 PM
dun mind copy out the installation file os 3650's cam and paste it fer us to download?

Barabba
28-03-2003, 06:11 PM
The camera mounted on 3650 and 7650 is the same?? Could u please post 2 photo made with the 2 phones to seen the differences?
tnx

skinnytonyuk
31-03-2003, 02:12 PM
Hi

I just bought a second hand 7650 that came with the cam installed.
My so called friend managed to delete it by accident.

As the phone was bought without the CD or cable is there a way to get my videorecorder back?
Any help or suggestions would be a great help.

dj^^
01-04-2003, 09:04 AM
u gotta use an infa connector to connect from ur com to ur hp...be4 u could do anything to ur 7650..no data cable require...

rado
03-04-2003, 08:34 AM
!. Zoom in mobiles is nonsense! (The same is valid for other image processing - stupid - you loose info)

Just think:

Speed and space constraints of a mobile software will never give you quality of PC algorithms. So, you better "zoom" images on your PC.
All efects done on PC are better too.

Plus extra software consumes your precious x650 space!

Perhaps the only thing to consider is: Does anyone wrote JPEG2000 coder for 60 series?

Sackgesicht
03-04-2003, 10:15 AM
Hi,

sorry, I must contradict massive to you.

The zoom in photographer software 2.0 is so good, it is incredible.
The quality is much better as at my digitalcamera (photo) (@ soft zoom mod - not optical). Only the zoom in "CameraFX" is not good. But Photographer? One reason, to buy this prog.
Here are for all new comparision pics:

1) Photographer, normal (=100%, no zoom)
http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/ph_100.jpg

2) Photographer, 400% zoom
http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/ph_400.jpg

3) Photographer, 1200% zoom
http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/ph_1200.jpg

4) Camera FX, 1200% zoom, too
http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/fx_1200.jpg


Greetz
Sackgesicht

dj^^
03-04-2003, 04:58 PM
but camera fx got much more functions...all those cute cute ones..
LOL:(

rado
03-04-2003, 05:02 PM
OK :-)

But still better image processing algorithms are to be found on "normal" computer and photografer still uses space.

If they implement jpg2000 and get smaler images with same quality, all buy it immediately.

r

Jijenes
13-04-2003, 05:28 AM
I have made some picture using the photographer...cant see any difference in the quality of the picture... i guess thats the only capability of the Nokia 7650 camera... its dull and color is very bluish i also made a comparison with my t68i with communicam MCA-20 and the picture quality is different as seen on color is better in the t68i and picture quality is clearer and color is crisp....

http://www.geocities.com/jijenes28/index.html

:confused:

danrence
24-04-2003, 08:15 AM
someone can send me the website or just send the camera FX program to me pls......this my add [email protected]

Horza
04-05-2003, 04:50 PM
so should i still use the normal built in camera or the PHOTOGRAPHER for 7650?

dj^^
04-05-2003, 06:57 PM
of course photographer!!!

Kingahking
05-05-2003, 06:27 AM
Hmm can any one sent me the software? cracked versioN?
[email protected]

yjagota
05-05-2003, 07:34 AM
Does the quality of pictures for both 7650 and 7250 same?

Kingahking
05-05-2003, 08:02 AM
hMmm whY i install the photographer...i open it...it shows error...

smarty3k
06-05-2003, 10:18 AM
Yes, this is a known issue with the current version. CameraFX only captures
images in 12-bit colour as opposed to 24-bit colour with the built in
Camera application. This is to enable fast special-fx and colour change
modes. We plan to support 24-bit captures in the next version of CameraFX,
which will be a free upgrade.
Thanks,
WildPalm Info
[email protected]


- the above mail was sent over 1 month ago .. i was complaining why the quality wasn't as good as the nokia built in software ........

paulw84
09-05-2003, 12:58 PM
photographer has the best zoom function, but camerafx has the best fx (and is much smaller in size)

dj^^
10-05-2003, 10:04 AM
yup i agree...

triceratopsz
02-09-2003, 04:33 PM
Hi!

Please anybody! Send me JS-Cam sofware from Jan-soft!
[email protected]

adnanb
02-09-2003, 11:09 PM
and whats about flexicam?

triceratopsz
03-09-2003, 10:38 AM
and whats about flexicam?

i will save picture without jpg compression!

pex3
08-09-2003, 11:27 AM
Hi! Please anybody! Send me :
1) JS-Cam sofware from Jan-soft,
2) Photographer,
3) CameraFX,
4) Flexicam.

Whit The CrAcKz??

Thanks a LoT!!

[email protected]

Alinus
08-09-2003, 12:26 PM
Hi! Please anybody! Send me :
1) JS-Cam sofware from Jan-soft,
2) Photographer,
3) CameraFX,
4) Flexicam.

Whit The CrAcKz??

Thanks a LoT!!

[email protected]

U are send one one week vacation.
when u come back read our rules.

No send me posts here !

AMKOR
09-09-2003, 03:53 PM
no quality chaged can be seen on the photos taken.... maybee there is nothing realy done with the capability of the phone camera

bracesguy
11-09-2003, 12:48 PM
... you welcome.

Here are pics again:

http://people.freenet.de/Sanitaer/Garage.jpg

Greetz
Sackgesicht


after checking the pics. i believe PHOTOGRAPHER has the best quality picture, next is nokia cam, then last is the cam fx. you can see it by looking clearly at the main gate, notice that the vertical line for PHOTOGRAPHER is much clear than nokia cam, while the cam fx is kinda blurred.